Judge Overturns Jury Verdict in Public Corruption Case

Former Mayor Ted LeBlanc was found guilty last April as a result of a probe that also netted convictions of former Norristown administrator Anthony Biondi and contractor Thomas Carbo.^[1]

LeBlanc was also found guilty of honest services fraud, bribery, bank fraud, and tax charges.^[2] LeBlanc, a republican, allegedly accepted a $10,000 bribe from borough insurance agent Herbert Bagley in exchange for LeBlanc insuring that Bagley (who is charged with paying a bribe to LeBlanc) continued to be appointed the borough’s insurance broker.^[3] Bagley was in danger of losing his contract because his business partner had been charged in state court with stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars of borough insurance payments in late 2002.^[4]

Carbo, who owned Tommy's Paving & Excavating and was involved in the contracting with the other men, was convicted of mail fraud and conspiracy in June 2006 and was facing 24 to 30 months in prison. ^[5] The jury deliberated for a little more than four hours following a six-day trial.^[6]

However now a federal judge has taken the rare action of overturning the jury’s verdict, saying no "rational" jury would have found a suburban contractor guilty in a public corruption case.^[7] According to testimony, Biondi paid Carbo for use of a truck that Biondi needed to do moonlighting jobs, and then awarded Carbo borough work without disclosing their financial relationship.^[8]

Federal criminal defense lawyer Dino Privitera had argued that Carbo should not be held criminally responsible for Biondi's lapse.

In a 75-page ruling issued Friday, Aug 10, U.S. District Judge Mary McLaughlin agreed.^[9] "The evidence presented is insufficient to allow a rational jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Carbo knew that Mr. Biondi was required to disclose their relationship to the state," she wrote.^[10]

Honest Services Fraud
When a person is convicted of some type of “honest services” fraud, it really means that 18 U.S.C. § 1346 is being used. Under section 1346, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud,” as found in the mail fraud statute, is understood to include a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.

Mail Fraud
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1341, it is a crime for a person to devise a scheme or artifice to defraud, and then use the nation’s mail system to carry out that scheme. The punishment for a violation of section 1341 is a fine, imprisonment for up to 20 years or both. If a financial institution is harmed in the scheme, the fine can be as high as $1,000,000, and the prison sentence can be as long as 30 years.

Federal criminal defense attorney Douglas McNabb has previously discussed the federal crime of bank fraud in his blog, here.

---

^[1] AP Staff, U.S. judge overturns contractor's guilt in Norristown corruption, Associated Press Newswire, August 13, 2007, available at available at LEXIS, News Library, Wire News Services File.
^[2] Rich Manieri, U.S. Attorneys Office Press Release, Former Norristown, PA, Mayor Found Guilty, April 17, 2007, available at http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/pae/News/Pr/2006/apr/LeBlanc.html (last visited August 13, 2007).
^[3] Id
^[4] Id.
^[5] AP Staff, supra note 1.
^[6] Manieri, supra note 2.
^[7] AP Staff, supra note 1.
^[8] Id.
^[9] Id.
^[10] Id.