Thursday, January 24, 2008

Bonds Moves to Dismiss Perjury Charges

Baseball player Barry Bonds asked a federal judge to dismiss his perjury charges, arguing that the indictment is "scattershot" and noted for its "striking inartfulness."[1]

Bonds was charged in November with lying to a grand jury about his use of performance-enhancing drugs.[2] In the motion filed in San Francisco federal court, the he neither admits nor denies taking the drugs but argues that the questions asked by prosecutors during Bonds' December 2003 grand jury appearance were vague, ambiguous and confusing.[3]

His federal criminal defense lawyers said "the questions posed to him by two different prosecutors were frequently imprecise, redundant, overlapping and frequently compound."[4]

Bonds' lawyers asked U.S. District Judge Susan Illston to either toss the case or order prosecutors to streamline the indictment, which cites 19 different instances of Bonds' alleged lying.[5]

Prosecutors asked Bonds several times whether personal trainer Greg Anderson supplied him with steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs beginning in 2000.[6] Bonds answered "no" or "not at all," but his lawyers argued that the questions were not clear.[7]

Bonds has pleaded not guilty to four charges of perjury and one count of obstruction.

Obstruction of Justice
Under 18 U.S.C. § 1503(a), it is a crime for a person to corruptly influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice. The punishment for a violation of section 1503(a) is a fine, imprisonment for up to 10 years, or both.

Federal criminal defense attorney Douglas McNabb has previous written about the federal crime of perjury, here; and he has previously written on Barry Bonds here.

[1] AP Staff, Bonds asks federal judge to throw out perjury case, Associated Press Newswire, January 23, 2008, January 9, 2008, available at LEXIS, News Library, Wire News Services.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.
[7] Id.

Labels: ,

Friday, November 16, 2007

Bonds Indicted for Perjury, Obstruction of Justice

Major League Baseball's career home run leader, Barry Bonds, has been indicted on five felony charges in connection with his testimony before a U.S. federal grand jury in 2003 that he never used anabolic steroids or human growth hormone.[1] The indictment tops off a four-year federal investigation into steroid use by elite athletes, of which Bonds has long been considered the primary target. Seven others have pleaded guilty in the case, most recently the former Olympic sprinter Marion Jones.[2]

The indictment, which includes four charges of perjury and one of obstruction of justice, contends that the government can prove that a positive steroid blood test result from 2000 seized in a 2003 raid of the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, or Balco, belonged to Bonds; if true, it would be the first direct evidence that Bonds took steroids.[3]

The 10-page indictment, can be found here, mainly consists of excerpts from Bonds' December 2003 testimony before a federal grand jury investigating the Bay Area supplements lab at the center of a steroid distribution ring. To assert the four counts of perjury, it cites 19 occasions in which Bonds allegedly lied under oath.[4]

An attorney familiar with the investigation asserts that the government obtained the results of positive steroids tests for Barry Bonds during a search of BALCO facilities, and the positive results did not come from confidential testing conducted by Major League Baseball and the players association. [5]

BALCO founder Victor Conte also served three months in prison after he pleaded guilty to steroids distribution. But Conte has long insisted that Bonds didn't get steroids from his lab. Conte says, however, that he "doesn't expect to testify" on behalf of Barry Bonds.[6]

Bonds was charged in the indictment with lying when he said he didn't knowingly take steroids given to him by his personal trainer, Greg Anderson.[7] Bonds is also charged with lying that Anderson never injected him with steroids. "Greg wouldn't do that....He knows I'm against that stuff." Bonds testified when asked if Anderson ever gave him any drugs that needed to be injected.[8]

Prosecutors promised Bonds they wouldn't charge him with any drug-related counts if he testified truthfully.[9] But according to the indictment, Bonds repeatedly denied taking any steroids or performance-enhancing drugs despite evidence to the contrary.[10]

According to the indictment, Bonds even denied taking steroids when prosecutors showed him the results of a test from November 2000 that showed a "Barry B" testing positive for two types of steroids. "I've never seen these documents," Bonds said. "I've never seen these papers."[11]

The indictment does not explain where prosecutors obtained those results, but they likely were conducted at BALCO.[12] Bonds first visited BALCO in November 2000 and submitted to the series of urine and drug tests conducted by BALCO founder Victor Conte on every athlete who went through the lab; the test results may have been seized when federal agents raided BALCO in September 2003.[13]

The indictment charged Bonds with four counts of perjury and one of obstruction of justice. If convicted, he could be sentenced to a maximum of 30 years in prison. Bonds is scheduled to appear in U.S. District Court in San Francisco on Dec. 7.

Perjury Perjury is generally covered under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 wherein it states that whoever, 1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true;[14] or 2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;[15] is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.[16]

Obstruction of Justice Under 18 U.S.C. § 1503(a), it is a crime for a person to corruptly influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice. The punishment for a violation of section 1503(a) is a fine, imprisonment for up to 10 years, or both.

[1] Duff Wilson and Michael S. Schmidt, Bonds is indicted on 5 felony charges, International Herald Tribune, November 16, 2007, available at http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/11/16/sports/base.php (last visited November 16, 2007).
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] ESPN Staff, Barry Bonds indicted on perjury, obstruction charges, ESPN.com news services, November 16, 2007, http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3112487 (last visited November 16, 2007).
[5] Id., In 2001, MLB conducted tests to guage the level of substance problems among players. The government subpoenaed those records.
[6] Id.
[7] Id.
[8] Id.
[9] Id.
[10] Id.
[11] Id.
[12] Id.
[13] Id.
[14] 18 U.S.C. § 1621 (1) (2007).
[15] Id., at § 1621(2).
[16] Id., at § 1621.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

GoInternet Execs Indicted for Fraud and Perjury

GoInternet.net Inc. president and chief executive officer Tyrone Barr, vice president Neal Saferstein and chief information officer Billy Light were charged in a 26-count federal indictment for allegedly perpetrating a fraud on customers for around $75 million, where the customers and potential clients would have been paying for Internet-related services without their consent.[1]

It has been asserted that GoInternet telemarketers would induce potential customers into receiving an information packet, which was designed to look like junk mail so that it would be thrown away, however receiving the packets triggered a $29.95 monthly charge on the companies' telephone bills unless they called to cancel.[2] Many companies paid because they didn't notice it, U.S. Attorney Patrick Meehan said.[3] In other cases, the government asserts that GoInternet would create Web sites and ads for companies without the companies' consent and then charge them for the services.[4]

At its peak, it employed 1,000 telemarketers in three downtown locations where workers cold-called small businesses, churches and individuals nationwide offering to create and host Web sites or advertising for the organizations. [5]

GoInternet, which was in business from 1997 to 2004, already had been the target of a civil suit by the Federal Trade Commission and was accused by several states of violating do-not-call lists.[6]

The men are all charged with multiple fraud counts, and 2 of them are also are charged with conspiring to commit perjury.[7] Saferstein is also charged with failing to declare $1.7 million in unreported income between 2001 and 2004, and failing to pay more than $2.8 million in payroll taxes.[8]

Perjury
Perjury is generally covered under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 wherein it states that whoever, 1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true;[9] or 2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;[10] is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.[11]


[1] AP Staff, 3 telemarketing execs charged in $75 million fraud probe, Associated Press Newswire, September 14, 2007, available at LEXIS, News Library, Wire News Services.
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.
[7] Id.
[8] Id.
[9] 18 U.S.C. § 1621 (1) (2007).
[10] Id., at § 1621(2).
[11] Id., at § 1621.

Labels:

Thursday, July 05, 2007

Libby's Sentence Not That Unusual

President Bush said on July 3, that in reaching the decision to commute the sentence of I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby, "I considered his background, his service to the country, as well as the jury verdict . . . I felt like the 30-month sentencing was severe; made a judgment, a considered judgment that I believe is the right decision to make in this case, and I stand by it."[1] However records show that President George W. Bush's Justice Department frequently seeks sentences that are as long, or longer, in cases similar to I. Lewis Libby's.[2]

Three-fourths of the 198 defendants sentenced in federal court last year for obstruction of justice - one of four crimes for which Libby was convicted - got jail time; federal sentencing data shows the average sentence obstruction alone was 70 months.[3] However in Libby's sentence, Bush said that the former aide had suffered enough and that the prison term ordered up by a federal judge was "excessive."[4] We have previously discussed this case here.

Yet, last week the Supreme Court upheld a 33-month prison sentence for an Army veteran convicted of lying to a federal agent about a machine gun he had purchased.[5] The vet had a record of public service - in Vietnam and the first Gulf War - and had no criminal record, but Justice Department lawyers argued his prison term should stand because it fit within the federal sentencing guidelines.[6]

The President's decision to make an exception for a political ally is irksome to many career Justice Department prosecutors who assert that the decision would make it harder to persuade judges to deliver appropriate sentences.[7] "It denigrates the significance of perjury prosecutions," John S. Martin Jr., a former U.S. attorney and federal judge in Manhattan, said of the commutation.[8]

Libby was also convicted of perjury, which is covered under 18 U.S.C. §1621 and states that a person who, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true;[9] or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true;[10] is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.


[1] Richard B. Schmitt & David G. Savage, Libby's sentence not unusually long, Los Angeles Times, July 4, 2007, available at http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-na-libby4jul04,0,6710317.story?coll=la-home-center (last visited July 5, 2007).
[2] Id.
[3] Id.
[4] Id.
[5] Id.
[6] Id.
[7] Id.
[8] Id.
[9] 18 U.S.C. §1621(1)(2007).
[10] Id. at. §1621(2)

Labels: ,